Robust Mouse Rejuvenation

Study 2

Overview

LEV Foundation's flagship research program is a sequence of large mouse lifespan studies, each involving the administration of (various subsets of) at least four interventions that have, individually, shown promise in others' hands in extending mean and maximum mouse lifespan and healthspan.

We focus on interventions that have shown efficacy when begun only after the mice have reached half their typical life expectancy, and mostly on those that specifically repair some category of accumulating, eventually pathogenic, molecular or cellular damage.

The first study in this program ran from early 2023 to early 2025. The second, described on this page, will begin - subject to funding - in the second half of 2025.

Goals and Motivations

As in RMR1, the ambition for RMR2 is to achieve "Robust Mouse Rejuvenation". We define this as an intervention or treatment program that:

  • is applied to mice of a strain with a well-documented mean lifespan of at least 30 months

  • is initiated at around 12 months younger than the mean lifespan

  • increases both mean and maximum lifespan by at least 12 months

The primary endpoint for the study is to determine the interactions between the various interventions, as revealed by differences between treatment groups (receiving different subsets of the interventions), on overall lifespan.

However, we are also investigating aging and morbidity trajectories, causes of death, and functional decline. In this way we will add greatly to the understanding of which benefits these interventions confer and how they synergize, or possibly antagonize.

While the RMR program aims to achieve robust rejuvenation in rodents, the implications of a successful outcome reach far beyond laboratory mice. Demonstrable rejuvenation in aged wild-type animals is a key step in securing broad public support of rejuvenation medicine extending beyond ‘soft’ targets such as lifestyle and supplementation.

Study Design

Strategic Evolution from RMR1: Key improvements following the results of the first RMR study include:

  • A larger number (8) of treatments will be included, targeting additional aging mechanisms.

  • Treatments that were not available (or verified) when RMR1 commenced are being included.

  • Some damage-repair interventions will be given repeatedly, rather than (as in RMR1) just once.

  • The use of smart cage technology will enable enhanced monitoring.

  • All animals (apart from in the true control groups) will receive rapamycin as a baseline treatment, as well as running wheels.

Age at study initiation: As in RMR1, interventions will begin in mid-late life, between 18-20 months of age, in order to assess the repair/rejuvenation capacity of interventions. The study will run through the remaining lifespan of all mice with the exception of animals selected for cross-sectional analysis at timepoints, as in RMR1.

Mouse Strain: RMR2 is expected to utilize CL57BL/6J mice, although we may switch to HET3, which are now available pre-aged through Jackson Laboratories. We are evaluating the benefits and drawbacks of both these strains and will update when a decision has been reached.

Treatment Groups: RMR2 is planned to include 20 different combinations of treatments, whereas there were only 10 in RMR1. This includes groups of mice receiving just one intervention so as to validate that we are successfully recapitulating effects reported in prior work. We continue to reason that little additional information would result from also including the various possible combinations of from two to six of the interventions. Seven out of eight, on the other hand, gives key information, especially on the existence of any antagonistic interactions. Other groups will be receiving all eight interventions.

Scale of study: We aim to conduct RMR2 on a similar basis as RMR1: two groups (one male and one female) for each of the 20 combinations being tested, with 50 animals in each group. This totals 1000 male and 1000 female mice. In the event of funding limitations, we may alternatively opt to start by conducting RMR2 in only one sex, which cuts the study size in half, while maintaining statistical power for individual treatment groups. While this will enable us to initiate RMR2 more expediently, using a single sex remains suboptimal due to significant known sexual dimorphism in mouse lifespan studies - including RMR1.

Baseline treatments: Combination therapies are only valuable if their benefit exceeds that of the best known alternative. To date, the most effective rejuvenation treatments are rapamycin, caloric restriction, and exercise. We carefully considered these in the context of RMR1, opting to include rapamycin as one of the four interventions for comparison. For RMR2, we are giving rapamycin to ALL the animals in all treatment groups. This will allow us to gauge the efficacy of other rejuvenation interventions when the overall damage burden is already slightly lowered.

Similarly, we have determined that animals in the RMR2 study will have access to a running wheel in their cages, permitting voluntary exercise. While the animals in RMR1 are provided some enrichment such as nesting material, wheels are not standard in conventional rodent housing. Physical activity is known to be a strong determinant of healthspan in both animals and humans, and we believe that no intervention can be maximally effective in obese, inactive mice. We do not consider this addition to be an “intervention” in itself, but rather a basic requirement in order to delay aging pathologies.

Data Collection: We intend to collect laboratory and functional data longitudinally, as RMR1, in addition to hematological and tissue data cross-sectionally from culled animals and from those humanely euthanized during the course of the study.

We are keen to establish collaborations with academics and industry researchers to take full advantage of the information potential arising from the study and the expertise of the research community. If you are interested in biospecimen or data from RMR2 for your field of study, please contact us at science@levf.org to discuss further.

Interventions